9/1/2023 0 Comments Living earth waco txThis inclusive language as elsewhere in the account suggests that the cataclysm was worldwide in scope. 13:9, 15 show that even in Genesis kol-ha ares refers to the whole land (Victor Hamilton, The Book of Genesis, Chapters 1-17, Eerdmans, 1990, p. Furthermore, the reference in 7:3 to the animals of kol-ha ares argues for an understanding of eres elsewhere in the Flood as earth in that almost all of the uses of kol-ha ares (outside of Deuteronomy and Joshua-Samuel) are references to the earth ( Gen. When eres refers to a particular piece of land, however, it is often followed by a prepositional phrase that further identifies the land (e.g., the land of the Canaanites, land of the east, land of the fathers), except in those places where mention is made theologically of the land promised to Israel. To be sure, eres is frequently rendered as (local) land, ground, and even underworld. Thus the description has all the appearances of a universal condition rather than a local one. Note that in 6:5-13, the earth ( ha ares) is mentioned eight times. Geographically, the problem is an infested earth. Old Testament authority Victor Hamilton writes: Universal terms are used throughout the narrative which speak of a world wide Flood. We find none of them substituting the word land for earth or using any other terms that would imply a limited scope for the Flood. Therefore there must compelling reasons to deny the traditional view.Īll Bible translations understand the account of the Flood in universal terms. The idea of a local Flood is comparatively recent in church history. The historical view of the Jews and the church has been to understand the Flood in a universal sense. It may be asked, How could God have taught a universal Flood more clearly? The global extent of the Flood is stated more than thirty times in Genesis 6-9.įurthermore, there is nothing in the account itself to cause the reader to deny the universal sense. If one simply reads the Genesis Flood account as it is written, the conclusion would be that the author is speaking of a worldwide Flood. ![]() ![]() The natural reading of the text would lead one to believe in a universal Flood. The arguments for a universal Flood are as follows: He did this by sending a universal Flood. Therefore He judged the human race by wiping out all of His creation except for eight souls. God regretted that He had created humanity. Instead the earth was filled with violence. The Bible says that humans were commanded to multiply and fill the earth. The traditional view is that the Bible speaks of a universal Flood that covered the entire earth, and destroyed all life except that which was taken on the ark.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |